Attached is another side by side topline analysis of the filed and reported congressional candidates, this time for CD4. UPDATE: The Brown report is now available online, and I have updated the numbers to reflect this. The differences are minimal.
Some comments below. Overall, I don’t know that I would call anyone in this race a big winner. There are questions for everyone. This is shaping up as something of a free for all. From the top:
Glenn Ivey: it’s good to be first, no question, so a pat on the back for that. On the other hand, he raised $117,000 in two weeks in March, so $275,000 as a follow up is good, but not great. Is he slowing down? He’s very top heavy with money from the legal profession (nothing wrong with that, of course) but can he break out and broaden the base in the third quarter?
Ingrid Turner: she’s not really second, she’s actually fifth, if you discount the loan money, but it does show a lot of commitment to drop $220K in right off the bat. But she has demonstrated very little fundraising prowess, and even at $40K, $2700 of that is a contribution from herself. She either has to step up the fundraising or pony up more money. Most of those I’ve spoken to about her situation think she went all in this time, so it’s time to hit the phones.
Joseline Pena-Melnyk: I’m biased, I gave to her, but I honestly think she’s in very good position. She has more cash on hand than the former lieutenant governor and a sitting committee chair. Only Glenn Ivey has demonstrated more fundraising clout than she has. Other factors: nobody works harder than Joseline, she’s by far the most progressive of the candidates, and if she continues to show solid fundraising numbers in Q3, rumblings are that national progressive groups will be looking hard at throwing significant IE money her way.
Dereck Davis: Yes, he got started later than everyone else. Yes, I have no doubt that he can raise a lot of money. But he didn’t. If he was going to wait until late May to crank it up, he should have put up a better number than this (see Matthews, Kathleen over in CD8). I know he can do better and raise more, but this was a missed opportunity for him. And his report reads like a who’s who of the lobbying and business communities: max contributions from Bruce Bereano and Gerry Evans, for starters. Can he raise his game on the numbers? Can he broaden his base and show more support from actual people? I’d bet on yes, at least as to the dollars.
Anthony Brown: the COH numbers, when put in a table, don’t look THAT bad. He’s only about $30-40K behind Pena-Melnyk and Davis. Even Ivey is only $180K ahead. But coming off the disastrous 2014 general election results, I don’t get any sense that there’s a fundraising rally lurking in the shadows for Brown. His name recognition is high (eight years in the legislature, followed by eight years as LG, will do that), but every other indicator is awful. Unless he can turn around perceptions and energize his campaign, things don’t look good here.
Warren Christopher: he’s put in $70K of his own money. Like Ingrid Turner, give him props for throwing down a wad of cash. Raising $23K, however, is not so good.
Lisa Ransom: the numbers pretty much speak for themselves.
Two other candidates were rumored to be running. Terence Strait filed for candidacy, but has not filed a fundraising report. Alvin Thornton has done neither. Not sure where they’d fit into this race, which already has four very viable candidates (five if Ingrid Turner can raise some money, which remains to be seen).
Right now, my take is this: in order, it’s Ivey, Pena-Melnyk, Davis and Brown. Up arrow for Pena-Melnyk, down arrow for Brown, holding steady for Ivey and Davis. I’ll withhold judgment on Ingrid Turner until the next reporting period.