Can be found here. And below.
So says theRockville website. No numbers.
No results yet. Will have them as soon as I can.
I’ll be reporting the Gaithersburg election results live from City Hall, then heading to Rockville for post election reactions. Stay tuned and follow the live video on Periscope. I’ll also have links to results elsewhere. Expecting results somewhere around the top of the hour.
I’m planning to do some reporting from the field today, happy not to be either a campaign operative or a candidate today. We’ll start with a report this morning from Takoma Park, where there are two contested races (mayor and city council ward 1), then hoof it over to Gaithersburg, where three candidates are running for mayor and four candidates are running for three city council seats. I’ll finish up later on today in Rockville, where the battle for mayor and four city council seats has raged among 11 candidates for several months now.
Stay tuned. Should be a fun day. At least for me. And hopefully for you too.
Just after I pressed send on the last Rockville post a few minutes ago, I was forwarded a letter from Don Hadley, the alleged “business partner” of Mayor Newton’s husband. From that letter, it appears that the entire claim of Hadley’s relationship to Fred Newton was that Hadley was the settlement attorney for the real estate transaction back in 2010. If that’s true, then the entire house of cards comes tumbling down and there is truly nothing here. Any blogger worth anything who printed that allegation should be ashamed of himself.
Oh, right. Never mind.
This is rapidly turning from an ugly political smear into a potential libel suit. From the looks of it, a pretty damn good one, too. Judge accordingly.
So earlier today, I mentioned that I had received a press release about Mayor Bridget Donnell Newton’s alleged ethical transgressions. I’m not going to print the release, but the contradictions fairly leap from the page. There are four main complaints:
First, the Osdoby campaign is unhappy that former Mayor Steve Van Grack endorsed Newton:
Former Mayor Steve Van Grack recently wrote to Sima Osdoby, one of the two mayoral candidates, to offer his client’s support for her campaign–if Sima adopted a controversial position favorable to their business. Sima quickly wrote back to reject the offer. I can provide copies of both letters. Two weeks after Sima rejected him, Van Grack donated to incumbent Bridget Newton’s campaign. Friday, Newton unveiled Van Grack’s endorsement in the attached mass mailing.
There’s no story here – taken at face value, Van Grack offered HIS CLIENT’S support for Osdoby in return for Osdoby adopting a particular position. She refuses. Later, Van Grack offered HIS OWN support to Newton, and Osdoby has no idea – other than pure conjecture – whether Van Grack placed any condition on his personal endorsement as he allegedly did on behalf of his unnamed client. Seen this way, the complaint here is petulant and whiny. Logic 101 grade: F.
The second claim involves Newton’s unwillingness to testify on a state bill requiring disclosure of spouse’s financial information for municipal candidates in Maryland. While I support the idea of such a bill, there are many who do not, and the argument is that it will drive away otherwise qualified candidates. The bill did not pass in 2015, it has been up for discussion in one form or another for several years, and if I’m not mistaken – I very well could be – I distinctly recall that then-Mayor David Lublin of Chevy Chase advocated against applying state ethics law generally to municipal elections and candidates.
The third and fourth claims are about Newton’s “nomination” or “appointment” of Don Hadley for the Rockville Planning Commission in 2010. Several readers have noted to me that it is solely the purview of the mayor – then Phyllis Marcuccio – to make appointments to public boards and the like. From the law (Section 2-218 of the City Code), this is true: “Boards and commissions shall consist of members that may include alternate members, appointed by the Mayor subject to confirmation by the Council.” What Bridget Newton – then a member of the City Council – did in 2010 was to simply make the nomination before the Council. She did not decide that Hadley should be nominated, she was simply offering the mayor’s candidate for a vote. David Lublin wrote originally that Newton “nominated” Hadley – this is spurious. But it provided the basis for Osdoby to claim that Newton “appointed” Hadley – this is completely mendacious. And Lublin simply reported it again, presumably not even noticing the change.
And if Osdoby was so upset about Hadley’s relationship with Newton, why in the world did she agree to have him moderate the debate last week? She could have vetoed that idea out of hand, but she didn’t. So she has no one else to blame but herself. The same is true of any council candidate, including the other four members of Osdoby’s Team Rockville slate. Why didn’t anyone bring this up? Good question – a shame nobody asked it. Including the guy who carried the water for the whole sorry mess of allegations. Yeah, David Lublin again. This is recycling in the not so good sense of the word, upping the ante on baseless allegations as the election draws closer.
I do not have a dog in the Rockville fight. I don’t know any of the players. I lived in Rockville for one year back in 1991-1992 while I was a law clerk to a judge in the courthouse there. My law office was there from 1996-2000. That’s it. As I indicated, I was inclined to say nothing about the press release at all because of the obvious problems with it. But when I saw what appears to me to be completely one-sided reporting and bullying and quite frankly slander, I get upset, regardless of who is involved. One side is dominating the public discussion of this election and that discussion has turned increasingly dishonest in the past several days. If I can help level the playing field, even a little bit, then I feel like I’ve done something good. And I really, really wish I’d stop finding David Lublin in the middle of every sleazy, shitty story I look at. I’m tired of talking about him.
Folks in Rockville, go vote tomorrow. But be informed. A truly informed voter is the most powerful weapon history has ever seen. But when you see allegations like this flying around just before an election, look carefully not only at what is being said, but who’s saying it, and why. Ask questions, use common sense. If something smells like shit, there’s probably a trash can full of it somewhere nearby.
An astute reader sent me the following letter of endorsement from five former Rockville mayors for current mayor Bridget Donnell Newton. Not taking sides, just passing it along for your information.
Later on today, I’ll have another story on the Rockville mayoral race in which blogger David Lublin, like a bad penny, turns up yet again. This time, he prints an allegation fed to him by a campaign, the campaign then cites his story in a press release, and this morning he simply reprints the press release. Points for recycling, but not much more than that.
As I’ll note later, I too got the press release, and there were such obvious and apparent problems with it that required follow up that I simply elected not to use the information. Being a good blogger is not being a conduit for your favorite candidate – there’s a lot more to it than that. At least as I see it, anyway.
Here’s an update to my earlier spreadsheet, with data through October 26, 2015. The first set of numbers is through October 1, the second is for October 1-26, and the last set is a cumulative total. The election is Tuesday. Happy reading.